Bilbao Crystallographic Server
SUBGROUPGRAPH
Description
|
By S. Ivantchev,
E. Kroumova,
G. Madariaga, J. M. Pérez-Mato, M. I. Aroyo
Departamentos de Física de la Materia Condensada y Física Aplicada II,
Universidad del País Vasco, Apdo 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain
The program SUBGROUPGRAPH analyzes the group-subgroup relations between space groups. Its results can be summarized as follows:
The specification of the group - subgroup pair G > H leads to a reduction of the general graph to a subgraph with G as the top vertex and H as the bottom one. In addition, the G > H subgraph contains all possible groups Zi which appear as intermediate maximal subgroups between G and H. The number of the vertices is further reduced if the index of H in G is specified.
Different chains of maximal subgroups for the group-subgroup pair G > H are obtained following the possible paths connecting the top of the graph (the group G) with the bottom (the group H). Each group - maximal subgroup pair determines one step from this chain. The index of H in G equals the product of the indices for each one of the intermediate edges. The transformation matrices, relating the conventional bases of G and H, are obtained by multiplying the matrices of each step of the chain. Thus, for each chain with a given index, there is a set of transformation matrices (Pj, pj), where each matrix corresponds to a subgroup Hj isomorphic to H. Some of these subgroups could coincide. To find the different Hj of G, the program transforms the elements of the subgroup H in the basis of the group G using the different matrices (Pj, pj), and compares the elements of the subgroups Hj in the group basis. Two subgroups that are characterized by different transformation matrices are considered identical if their elements, transformed to the basis of the group G, coincide.
The different subgroups Hj are further distributed into classes of conjugate subgroups with respect to G by checking directly their conjugation relations with elements of G.
The distribution of the subgroups Hj into classes of conjugate subgroups obtained by this method can be compared with the corresponding results obtained by the application of the normalizer procedure described by Koch (Koch E., (1984) Acta Cryst. A 40, 593-600).
This list is represented also as a graph. Each space group in the list corresponds to one vertex in the graph, and its maximal subgroups are the neighbors (successors) of this vertex. Group-subgroup relations in both directions (for example Pm-3 > Fm-3 and Fm-3 > Pm-3) are represented by vertices connected with two lines. If one vertex is connected to itself (a loop edge) then the corresponding space group has a maximal subgroup of the same type.
The graphical representation contains the intermediate groups that connect G and H with the specified index. This graph is a subgraph of the lattice of maximal subgroups with unspecified index.
Each class is represented in a table which contains the chains and the transformation matrices used to obtain the subgroups in this class. There is also a link to a list of the elements of the subgroups transformed to the basis of the group.
The graph in this case contains the same space group types Zi as the graph of the previous step but the different isomorphic subgroups are represented by different vertices. At the bottom of the graph are given all isomorphic subgroups Hj. Their labels are formed by the symbol of the subgroup followed by a number given in parenthesis which specifies the class of conjugate subgroups to which the subgroup Hj belongs.
Note that for group-subgroup pairs with high indices, where a lot of intermediate maximal subgroups occur, the resulting graph could be very complicated and difficult to overview.
|
Bilbao Crystallographic Server http://www.cryst.ehu.es |
For comments, please mail to administrador.bcs@ehu.es |